Published on February 18th, 2013 | by Zach8
One Of The Biggest Things I Learned From The Tesla–NYTimes Debacle
(Update) Also See:
- Second Thing I Learned From The Tesla–NYTimes Debacle
- Third Thing I Learned From The Tesla–NYTimes Debacle
I’ve written several articles on the Tesla–NYTimes (or Tesla–John Broder) story. But way beyond the specifics of that actual story, several electric vehicle topics keep coming up in other bloggers’ or reporters’ articles about the story, and in comments on the bottom of all those articles. Unfortunately, perceptions regarding several of these topics are often a bit off. Here’s one of the biggest things I learned from this whole Tesla–NYTimes firestorm:
People Don’t Understand How They Drive
One of the only articles I read and actually found useful about the Tesla–NYTimes debacle was one by Martin LaMonica on OnEarth. He pulled out a stat that I think is very important — “Nearly all — 97 percent — of the driving trips that Americans take are less than 50 miles, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation.”
Why is this stat so important? Because there’s a great misconception about how much range an electric car needs to have. The test drive on which John Broder was taking the Tesla Model S was a very long test drive, a drive that almost no one makes on a regular basis… if ever. 450 miles is far longer than the 50 or less that we drive 97% of the time.
Now, jumping off of that stat above, look at the range of these pure electric vehicles:
- Nissan Leaf — 73 miles
- Mitsubishi i — 62 miles
- smart electric drive — 68 miles
- smart fortwo — 87 miles
- Wheego Whip — 40 miles
- Wheego LiFe — 100 miles
- Coda Coda — 88 miles
- Ford Focus Electric — 76 miles
- Fiat 500e — 87 miles
- Honda Fit EV — 82 miles
- Tesla Model S — 208 miles (or more if you get one with a larger battery pack)
- Toyota RAV4 EV — 104 miles
Yep, 11 pure-electric vehicles have a range greater than 97% of our trips. Obviously, this means that, for most of us, pure-electric vehicles have adequate range for our daily, weekly, and even monthly needs. It is not a compromise to go electric.
Yet, many, many commenters, and even reporters and bloggers who supposedly have an “expert” opinion on the matter, don’t realize this.
Yes, some people do take longer trips on a regular basis (but that’s a tiny percentage of our population). Yes, some people like to take long road trips (rather than flying, taking the train, or taking a coach/bus) when they go on vacation. But even for those people, there are extended range (or plug-in hybrid) electric vehicles that will give you the range of an inefficient gasmobile when needed but will run on electricity the majority of the time. Check out these plug-in hybrid electric vehicles:
- Chevy Volt (aka Opel Ampera in Europe)
- Mitsubishi Outlander Plug-In Hybrid
- Ford Fusion Energi Plug-in Hybrid
- Ford C-Max Energi Plug-in Hybrid
- Honda Accord Plug-in Hybrid
- Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid
- Fisker Karma
In summary, there are a ton of electric vehicles one could buy and drive for all of their regular purposes. There are plug-in hybrid electric vehicles that can fit the needs of those who regularly drive longer distances, or who have absurdly long drives to work and nowhere to charge there (but seriously, not many of you have a 25-mile trip to work).
For the rest of us, if you want to take a long trip in a car once a year or so, there are things called rental cars (a lot of people use them for this purpose anyway in order to keep their car in better shape), or you can see if a friend or family member wants to swap cars for a bit and maybe even accept an extra gift for the extra miles you’re going to put on their 4-wheeler.
Common sense? I think so. Unfortunately, it isn’t yet as common as it should be. Help spread the word!